German winemakers 'declare war' on Gault Millau

German winemakers 'declare war' on Gault Millau

You may be aware of Gault Millau as a restaurant guide, but they also publish Wine Guide Deutschland, the "definitive guide to German wine". Today, a group of leading German winemakers has announced that it will not only stop sending their wines to Gault Millau, they also refuse to even have their wineries listed in the wine guide.

The list of winemakers who have signed the open letter reads like a who is who of German wine: Helmut Dönnhoff, grand master of Riesling, Knipser, who had just won the title "vintner of the year", Pinot Noir experts Dr. Heger and Meyer-Näkel, Josef Leitz (famously called "our friend Josi" by wine merchants Pinard de Picard) and Heymann-Löwenstein, who has redefined the Wine Rambler's understanding of what mineral means in a Riesling, to name just a few.

What has enraged this community of vintners so much? Basically, Gault Millau were asking listed wineries for a "voluntary" contribution of about 200 €. The publisher justifies this by saying they need the money to sustain the Guide in economically tough times and that editorial staff will not be notified whether a winemaker has paid the contribution or not. In addition, winemakers who do pay get a few perks, such as permission to use logo and reviews for their own marketing. I can understand that economically tough times lead to a search for new sources of income - and wine publications in Germany are under much economic pressure. Critics of the "contribution" argue that it could create bias among the reviewers and that it makes it harder for the small wineries to get their wines reviewed. Customers do of course expect unbiased advice and so you may see this as a dangerous precedent. Or you can argue that winemakers should have an interest in marketing their produce and that Wine Guide is a key tool and hence worth sustaining. However, would you trust an unbiased adviser that is financed by those being reviewed?

Whatever you think, it will be interesting to see how Gault Millau can continue to publish a wine guide without some of the most respected producers - and I would expect at least some others to join the list. It will also be interesting to see how the wine world reacts to the open letters. After all, the likes of Knipser can surely afford two hundred Euros, so they cannot claim to be affected economically. I do also wonder if they contacted the winemakers associations before going public.

Leaving all conspiracy theories aside, one can wonder though whether a publication such as the Wine Guide is the right medium for the new media world. Do wineries maybe sell more if they are active on Twitter and get good reviews from the blogosphere? Should winemakers see the fee for the Wine Guide just as a marketing investment? If the Wine Guide would go bust without the money, would it be an institution worth rescuing?

Others use another business model: for instances charges the readers, not the winemakers. Either way, the current economic crisis will probably put quite a few other "institutions" to the test and might accelerate a transformation in publishing that was in the making anyway. Personally, this will not affect me much as I have preferred the Internet over other media for some the years now. However, I do also think that there is a place for wine writing beyond blogging.

Thanks to Patrick Johner for posting this. I will now open a nice Riesling Spätlese and enjoy it with a roast pumpkin to make me think of nicer things...

Submitted by torsten Friday, 03/07/2009

The first reactions to this have come in (mostly in German); so far reactions are divided. Some argue that several of the winemakers did have an axe to grind with Gault Millau anyway.…
(this posting has some interesting background information)…

Submitted by torsten Friday, 03/07/2009

In reply to by torsten

More and more reactions are coming in. Journalists, bloggers, critics and even more bloggers are commenting on the open letter and the consequences. Most comments I have come across today are critical of the renegades.

Winemaker Würtz thinks that this action is mainly directed at the head of Gault Millau; he asks why, if there was so much criticism, it as not been voiced publicly beforehand.

Another winemaker defends Gault Millau against the critics that, he thinks, have gone too far.

Jancis Robinson briefly summarises the situation (I have mainly included this for those of you who only read English - there is not too much new information here):

A strong reaction comes for a wine forum where members are very critical of the "renegades":

What I find quite interesting is that Knipser do still have a scan of Gault Millau on their website. They have signed the letter and do not want to be mentioned any more, but are still very happy to use the Gault Millau title 'vintner of the year' for their marketing, including the Gault Millau. It may just be that they are very slow updating their website, but it does not look to good, I think: